Learning from Demonstration (LfD) empowers robots to acquire new skills through human demonstrations, making it feasible for everyday users to teach robots. However, the success of learning and generalization heavily depends on the quality of these demonstrations. Consistency is often used to indicate quality in LfD, yet the factors that define this consistency remain underexplored. In this paper, we evaluate a comprehensive set of motion data characteristics to determine which consistency measures best predict learning performance. By ensuring demonstration consistency prior to training, we enhance models' predictive accuracy and generalization to novel scenarios. We validate our approach with two user studies involving participants with diverse levels of robotics expertise. In the first study (N = 24), users taught a PR2 robot to perform a button-pressing task in a constrained environment, while in the second study (N = 30), participants trained a UR5 robot on a pick-and-place task. Results show that demonstration consistency significantly impacts success rates in both learning and generalization, with 70% and 89% of task success rates in the two studies predicted using our consistency metrics. Moreover, our metrics estimate generalized performance success rates with 76% and 91% accuracy. These findings suggest that our proposed measures provide an intuitive, practical way to assess demonstration data quality before training, without requiring expert data or algorithm-specific modifications. Our approach offers a systematic way to evaluate demonstration quality, addressing a critical gap in LfD by formalizing consistency metrics that enhance the reliability of robot learning from human demonstrations.

Nowadays both commercial and open-source academic LLM have become the mainstream models of NLP. However, there is still a lack of research on LLM consistency, meaning that throughout the various stages of LLM research and deployment, its internal parameters and capabilities should remain unchanged. This issue exists in both the industrial and academic sectors. The solution to this problem is often time-consuming and labor-intensive, and there is also an additional cost of secondary deployment, resulting in economic and time losses. To fill this gap, we build an LLM consistency task dataset and design several baselines. Additionally, we choose models of diverse scales for the main experiments. Specifically, in the LightGBM experiment, we used traditional NLG metrics (i.e., ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR) as the features needed for model training. The final result exceeds the manual evaluation and GPT3.5 as well as other models in the main experiment, achieving the best performance. In the end, we use the best performing LightGBM model as the base model to build the evaluation tool, which can effectively assist in the deployment of business models. Our code and tool demo are available at https://github.com/heavenhellchen/Consistency.git